One of the most captivating aspects of the NCAA Women’s Basketball Tournament is the unpredictable drama of an upset. While they may wreak havoc on even the most carefully crafted brackets, the magic of a Cinderella run is what truly defines March Madness.
Since the tournament expanded to a 64-team format in 1994, lower-seeded teams have occasionally defied the odds to make unforgettable postseason runs. Among these, the No. 12 seeds stand out as the most successful underdogs. With 31 victories to their name since expansion, 12-seeds have consistently been the spark for early-round surprises.
In contrast, teams seeded 13 through 16 have faced far greater challenges. Combined, those four seed lines have tallied just 11 wins — and notably, No. 14 and No. 15 seeds have yet to record a single tournament victory.
Below is a breakdown of each seed’s performance in the tournament since the 64-team era began, including their best finishes and historical win-loss records.
Seed | Overall record | Best finish |
---|---|---|
No. 1 | 475-101 | Champions (23 times) |
No. 2 | 332-119 | Champions (five times) |
No. 3 | 272-121 | Champions (three times) |
No. 4 | 218-124 | Runner-up (once, 1994 Louisiana Tech) |
No. 5 | 148-124 | Runner-up (once, 2013 Louisville) |
No. 6 | 127-124 | Final Four (once, 1997 Notre Dame) |
No. 7 | 105-124 | Final Four (twice) |
No. 8 | 65-124 | Sweet 16 (once, 2006 Boston College) |
No. 9 | 68-124 | Final Four (once, 1998 Arkansas) |
No. 10 | 50-124 | Elite Eight (once, 2017 Oregon) |
No. 11 | 51-124 | Elite Eight (once, 2011 Gonzaga) |
No. 12 | 31-124 | Sweet 16 (twice) |
No. 13 | 10-124 | Sweet 16 (three times) |
No. 14 | 0-124 | First round |
No. 15 | 0-124 | First round |
No. 16 | 1-124 | Second round (once, 1998 Harvard) |
While upsets capture headlines and hearts, the data tells a clear story: higher seeds win more—and more often.
Since the NCAA Women’s Basketball Tournament expanded to 64 teams in 1994, No. 1 seeds have dominated. Over 31 years, they’ve amassed 475 victories, averaging 15.3 wins per year. That breaks down to roughly 3.83 wins per team per tournament—essentially, a consistent march to the Elite Eight.
No. 2 seeds follow with 332 total wins, averaging 10.7 per year, or 2.68 per seed. That difference of more than one win per team highlights the substantial advantage of earning a top seed—while seeding isn’t everything, it clearly plays a critical role.
Only seeds 1 through 6 hold winning records in tournament play. Though No. 7 seeds enter the first round as favorites, they fall below .500 overall. Why? Their frequent first-round losses to 10 seeds, combined with second-round matchups against strong No. 2 seeds, limit their success. The same pattern applies to 8 and 9 seeds, who rarely advance past their second-round showdowns with top-ranked teams.
The most dominant display by a single seed line came when all four No. 1 seeds reached the Final Four. That feat—achieved in 2012, 2015, and 2018—resulted in 19 combined wins each time. Notably, the only losses suffered by No. 1 seeds in those tournaments came at the hands of fellow top seeds.
- Google Doodle Celebrates King’s Day (Koningsdag) 2025 - April 26, 2025
- NCAA DIII Men’s Volleyball Championship 2025: Full Bracket, Schedule, and Scores - April 26, 2025
- NCAA DII Men’s Golf 2025: See the Complete List of Regional Selections - April 26, 2025